5,000-year old throne in Turkey alludes to the world’s first evidence of a real palace

5000-year Old_Throne_Turkey_king_2Credit: Marcella Frangipane

A 5,000 years old adobe construction can provide a crucial glimpse into what might be the start of humanity’s state system and its chosen ruler. Unearthed in Aslantepe in the eastern Turkish province of Malatya, this adobe platform possibly pertains to the construction of a ‘throne’, as it was initially raised three steps above the floor level. Moreover, archaeologists (from La Sapienza University in Rome) also discovered remains of burnt wood on this platform, which might have suggested the use of timber for the wooden chair of the throne.

As for the main site itself, the researchers are baffled by the sheer scope of a massive complex that dates from 4th millennium BC (probably between the period of 3350-3100 BC). Comprising two temples, storage rooms, a central courtyard, an assortment of other connected enclosures, and a grand entrance way with its corridor, there is little doubt this complex consisted of a large Neolithic palace. The expansive spatial ambit is further complemented by impressive embellishments, including red and black motifs and geometrical patterns. Marcella Frangipane, the excavation director of the project, said –

It’s the world’s first evidence of a real palace and it is extremely well preserved, with walls standing two meters high. In the past two campaigns we found a large courtyard which can be reached through the corridor. On the courtyard stands a monumental building.

5000-year Old_Throne_Turkey_king_1

Credit: AA

Quite intriguingly, the aforementioned throne was located inside a room that connects with the courtyard. The researchers analysed the layout of this ‘palace’, and found that the particular room was not a part of the adjacent temple complex; rather it stands separate in the the heart of the building. Such a plan certainly alludes to the shift in politics and religion, with a secularized head-of-state (the king) given importance over mere religious rites. In essence, an independent state-governing system was possibly already established in the area.

Additionally, the archaeologists also found two smaller adobe pedestals that are at a lower height than the original ‘throne’ platform. These were probably used by subjects who stood in front of the king to make their courtly appearance.

Source: DiscoveryNews

  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Michael Baizerman

    The article does not elaborate on the difference between a temple and a palace complex. Raised platforms were in temples, too. A throne might have been occupied by a god or a high priest who at that period-late IV millennium usually combined cleric and political leadership. The period cannot be Neolithic but rather a local parallel to the Late Uruk period in Sumer.

        ROH Subscription

To join over 2,300 other subscribers, simply provide your email address: