10 things you should know about the Scythians and their warfare

10-facts-scythians-warfareIllustration by Angus McBride.

When it comes to the popular history of nomadic groups, tribes (and super-tribes) like Huns and Mongols have had their fair share of coverage in various mediums, ranging from literary sources to even movies. However hundreds of years before the emergence of mixed-Huns, Turkic and Mongolic groups, the Eurasian steppes were dominated by an ancient Iranic people of horse-riding nomadic pastoralists. These ‘horse lords’ dwelt on a wide swathe of landmass known as Scythia since antiquity. Epitomizing the very dynamic scope of the nomadic lifestyle – covering an impressive spectrum from workmanship to warfare, they were thus known as the Scythians, the master horsemen and archers of Iron Age.

1) The ‘giant killers’ of the ancient world –


Illustration by Angus McBride.

While the ‘Scythian Age’ only corresponded to the period between 7th century to 3rd century BC, the remarkable impression left behind by these warrior people was evident from the historic designation of (most of) Eurasian steppes as Scythia (or greater Scythia) even thousands years after the rise and decline of the nomadic group. Now part of this legacy had to do with the incredible military campaigns conducted by the Scythians from the very beginning of their ‘brush’ with the global stage. According to Herodotus, they started off by defeating their nomadic brethren – the Cimmerians, and then dealt with the Iranian Medes; all before 7th century BC

And by 7th century BC, the emergent Scythians audaciously went into war with the sole superpower of the Mesopotamian region – Assyria. Now while Assyrian sources mostly keep mum about some of the presumed Scythian victories over them, it is known that one particular Assyrian monarch Esarhaddon was so desperate to secure peace with these Eurasian nomads that he even offered his daughter in marriage to the Scythian king Partatua. This however didn’t stop the Scythians from ravaging the coastal parts of Middle East, until they reached Palestine and even the borders of Ancient Egypt. Consequently they were bribed with rich tributes by the pharaoh – and on their returning route, some remnants of the Scythian army allied with a Median force to finally lay siege to the Assyrian capital of Nineveh in 612 BC, thus paving the way for the downfall of the superpower. As for the effect on the populace of the Middle East, a biblical prophet summed up the baleful nature of the ferocious ‘horse lords’ from north –

They are always courageous, and their quivers are like open grave. They will eat your harvest and bread, they will eat your sons and daughters, they will eat your sheep and oxen, they will eat your grapes and figs.

2) The people’s army –


Illustration by Angus McBride.

Oddly enough, while the socio-political effects of the Scythian incursions in the Middle East can be comprehended to some degree from contemporary (or near-contemporary) sources, historians are still mystified by the logistical and organizational capacity of the military of these nomads from the distant steppes. But it can be hypothesized that like most nomadic societies, the majority of the adult population was liable for military service (including some of the younger women). Now the tactical advantage of such a scope translated to how the bulk of the early Scythians were mounted warriors – mostly lightly armored with hide jackets and rudimentary headgear.

Carrying weapons such as arrows, javelins and even darts, the hardiness, mobility and unorthodox fighting methods espoused by these throngs of horsemen seemingly countered the more ‘sedentary’ battle tactics of the wealthy Mesopotamian civilizations. Furthermore, the light troops were backed up by a core force of heavily-armored shock cavalry that was usually commanded by the local princes – and they took to the battlefield for the killing blow after the perplexed enemy was both ‘softened’ by the projectiles and harassed by zig-zag maneuvers.

3) The Scythian archers –


Illustration by Angus McBride.

According to some scholars (including Indo-Europeanist Oswald Szemerényi), the very etymological route of the term Scythian, and its other known ancient variants, like Assyrian Aškuz and Greek Skuthēs, is derived from *skeud-, an ancient Indo-European root meaning “propel, shoot”. Thus the restored Scythian name is *Skuda which basically entails an ‘archer’. So from this linguistic angle, we can pretty much sum up the importance of archery and bow in the Scythian society.

The archaeological evidence from Scythian burial mounds also bolsters the theory of how these Eurasian nomads were masters of archery, especially from horseback, much like many of the later armies emerging from the steppes. Unfortunately, while archaeology has aided in preserving many of the arrowheads from such burial mounds, the design of the actual Scythian bow is lost to the rigors of time; and so has to be hypothesized from pictorial and literary evidences. To that end, some written descriptions have mentioned how the composite Scythian bow might have resembled the Greek letter Σ (sigma) in its recurved, unstrung form – and their sizes were probably a bit smaller than comparable specimens. As for the strings, the stretchy components were usually made out of horse hair or flexible yet sturdy animal tendons.

Most ancient authors concur on how the Scythian bow was heavy and extremely stiff, thus hinting at the substantial strength and deft skill needed to wield such weapons, especially from horseback. In fact, both extant and pictorial evidences suggest the penetrating power (and considerable range) of these bow varieties, with examples of skulls with still-embedded arrowheads and depictions of armored warriors being penetrated by arrows. However, in spite of the tough nature of the powerful recurved bow, the expert Scythian archers could match the firing rates of their Middle Eastern counterparts, with the capacity to unleash 10-12 arrows in a minute. Now considering that each archer carried around 30 to 150 arrows in a battle, the Scythians could entirely shoot out their potent projectiles within 15 minutes of the encounter. Considering this tactical scope, one could only imagine the terror and affliction unleashed by ancient Scythian archery – with their hail of arrows and troop of horses ‘tailored’ to crush the morale of most enemy forces.

4) The ‘fish scale’ armor  –


Illustration by Angus McBride.

Many ancient armies used some variants of the corselet armor because of its general effectiveness against melee weapons. The Scythians were no exceptions, though they did modify some elements of the conventional corselet by arranging the metal (or leather) bits in a ‘fish scale’ like pattern. These scales were usually arranged in a meticulous manner so that one metal bit could cover around one-third (or half) of the adjacent bit, thus resulting in an overlapping pattern. This overlapping technique was also repeated along the rows, thereby protecting the stitching and holes. And since we brought up stitching, these scales were affixed to a softer leather base with the help of animal tendons and leather strings.

Interestingly enough, the Scythian preference for fish scale armor was not just limited to corselets; they even crafted such scale-like protective layers upon their helmets, shields and even fabric clothing. So while the fish scale armor was sturdy enough for most melee situations, one of the primary reasons for adopting this specific armor style was intrinsically related to the mobility it offered to the wearer. In fact, from the historical perspective, other variants of the scale armor (like its lamellar counterpart) had survived for over a thousand years in various battlefield conditions around the world, thus attesting to its effectiveness and simplicity of use. Simply put, the scale armor can be considered as one of the major innovations in the history of military technology.

5) The Amazonian factor –


The so-called ‘Amazons’ pertain to the warrior-women generally associated with Greek mythology. Now according to Herodotus, beyond sensationalized storytelling and mythology, these women were related to the Scythians and came from the geographical region of Sarmatia (present-day Ukraine). And much to his credit, modern archaeologists have been able to unveil actual evidences that directly point to how women (or for that matter – warrior women) played a significant role in Scythian raids and conquests.

To that end, many researchers have taken advantage of DNA testing and other bio-archaeological scientific analysis to make deeper analysis of the occupants of many Scythian burial mounds. To their surprise, the archaeologists found that around one-third of all Scythian women were buried with weapons. As a matter of fact, not only were these deceased accompanied by knives and daggers, but also bore marks of war-injuries, much akin to their male counterparts. Simply put, such discoveries strongly suggest that there were groups of actual Scythian women who match the description of the ancient Amazons.

Unfortunately, these Scythian ‘Amazons’ got a bad rap from antiquity, with 5th century BC folk etymology (probably invented by the Greek historian Hellanikos) suggesting how the word Amazon roughly translated to ‘without breasts’, which alluded to the popular (though ill-informed) notion that these women cleaved off one of their breasts for better posture while shooting from the bow. However, as we mentioned before, the very ‘manageable’ size of the smaller Scythian bow relates to a conceivable scenario where a woman could handle this primary weapon as well as her male counterpart, without requiring any anatomical ‘modification’. In that regard, the correct etymological origin of the word Amazon may have its roots in Old Persian *hama-zan meaning ‘all women’ or Iranian ethnonym *ha-mazan – ‘warriors’

6) The paradox of craftsmanship and warfare –


Beyond their savage ferocity, plundering tendencies and acumen for sustained warfare (which Darius learned the hard way – discussed later in the post), the Scythians had demonstrated their expertise in another field. And this ironically pertained to their penchant for creating fascinating specimens of gold-made artworks and artifacts. To that end, as we mentioned before, much of the archaeological legacy of the nomadic Scythians come from their large burial mounds (also known as kurgans), some of which rise over 20 m or 70 ft. Dotting the expansive scope of the Eurasian steppe belt, these mounds are found in disparate areas ranging from Balkans, southern Russia to Mongolia and even Siberia. Suffice it to say, the tombs are still the largest source of Scythian gold artifacts – with the art-styles of these objects being inspired by the neighboring cultures around Scythia. In other words, the influences are varied in their ambit with Greek, Urartian (ancient Armenian), Iranian, Indian, Chinese and local nature of craftsmanship playing their crucial roles in developing the unique and intricate ‘Scythian art’.

In essence, the craftsmanship exhibited by the numerous Scythian gold artifacts may been worked on by both Greek and indigenous artisans, while others were imported over a long distance from the Greek mainland. However, there is one element of the art-style that stands out, and it relates to the predominance of zoomorphic symbology in the Scythian gold artifacts. Simply put, Scythian art demonstrated by their gold objects, generally comprises a host of beast depictions – including stags, lions, panthers, horses, birds and even mythical creatures (like griffins and sirens). Thee animals were often complemented by depictions of humans, including their faces, bodies, and sometimes groups of men – taking part in scenes like fighting, herding, taming horses and even milking sheep. Another thematic element that is often found in many of such artifacts (discovered in the western Scythian lands) relates to the use of Greek motifs (specifically from their mythology and history), which in turn are complemented by the Greek style of ornamentation and floral patterns.

7) The Greek connection in armor –


Illustration by Angus McBride.

Beyond the scope of inspired workmanship, by 5th century BC, many of the Scythian kings and nobles also opted for ‘foreign’ styled Greek helmets and greaves – possibly as a show of prosperity. Archaeological excavations that pertain to this period have unearthed over 60 fascinating specimens of Greek helmets (of Corinthian, Chalcidian and Attic types) that were actually manufactured in mainland Greece and then shipped across the Black Sea into Scythian heartland via the wealthy Greek Bosporan colonies. The ancient scope in itself mirrored a wide ranging trade network that not only entailed arms and military equipment, but also slaves. Furthermore, the Scythians themselves exported profitable items like grain, wheat, flocks, and even cheese to Greece.

8) Penchant for marijuana –


The Scythian proclivity for marijuana (and cannabis) was nigh legendary – as attested by even ancient sources. Herodutos mentioned –

After the burial…they set up three poles leaning together to a point and cover them with woolen mats…They make a pit in the center beneath the poles and throw red-hot stones into it… they take the seed of the hemp and creeping under the mats they throw it on the red-hot stones, and being thrown, it smolders and sends forth so much steam that no Greek vapour-bath could surpass it. The Scythians howl in their joy at the vapor-bath.

Archaeological evidences rather support such ‘trippy’ scenarios, with one particular find pertaining to a burial of a warrior who had his head drilled – possibly to counter its swelling. He was accompanied by a cache of cannabis for a good smoke even in his afterlife. And beyond just burial rituals, smoking pot was possibly a favorite pastime of the nobles within the Scythian society. To that end, back in 2015, Russian researchers came across solid gold ‘bongs’ with exquisite craftsmanship (pictured above), inside a kurgan mound located in the Caucasus region. The experts additionally identified a black residue on the inner portion of one of the gold vessels. On further analysis of the substance (by criminologists), the results showed that the residues had been formed by not only cannabis, but also opium.

9) The showdown with the Persians –


After more than hundred years since the audacious Scythian raids and forays into the culturally rich regions of ancient Middle East, it was the nomads’ turn to face the wrath of the sedentary armies from ‘south’. By late 6th century BC, Darius I had already established the mighty Persian empire which was probably the largest superpower of the ancient world in terms of controlled landmass – stretching from Anatolia and Egypt across western Asia to the borders of northern India and Central Asia. And while Darius had always coveted the western lands of the Greek city-states, his strategic acumen convinced the ‘king of kings’ to secure the northern passages before a Greece-bound invasion. Thus the Scythian campaign was launched, and according to Herodotus the Persian army numbered around 700,000 men. Now obviously, while this (improbable) figure must have been embellished, there is little doubt that the Scythia-invading forces was one of the largest armies ever gathered in the ancient times.

Interestingly enough, the Persian army possibly took the European route, by crossing the Hellespoint and then overrunning the Thracian positions. They finally arrived at the Danube, and successfully traversed the mighty river by anchoring ships across its banks. Hence the full-scale invasion of Scythia began – pitting the sole superpower of the late 6th century BC against the boisterous nomadic ‘giant killers’ of the ancient world.

10) Mouse, frog, bird and five arrows –


Credit: CAIS

Unfortunately for the Persians, in spite of wide ranging military reforms initiated by Darius, the bulk of their army comprised infantrymen. Now considering the vast expanse of the Scythian steppes, this proved to be a logistical blunder, especially since the Persians had the unenviable task of supporting their high number of troops through disparate supplies in an alien land. The situation of the opposing Scythians was not so easy either, with most of their allies refusing to militarily aid them – possibly because many of these fringe nomadic tribes were afraid of incurring the wrath of Darius.

Nevertheless the Scythians (by this time, ruled by three kings with their different hosts) decided to take advantage of the Persian logistical predicament, by employing hit-and-run tactics – conducive to equestrian warfare. So as the Persian forces slowly advanced through the Scythian heartland, they were not faced in open-battlefields by the mobile enemy, but rather harassed in strategic locations and greeted with scorched lands and poisoned wells. Consequently, the Persians began to run low on the essentials of food, water and forage – and Darius was forced to stop his ponderous advance and set up a fortified camp by the northern flank of the Sea of Azov. The desperate Persian emperor even sent out a messenger to the Scythian high ruler who asked him – why the Scythians were not offering any direct battle? In reply, King Idanthyrsus (one of the three Scythian kings) said, according to Herodotus –

This is my way, Persian. I never fear men or fly from them. I have not done so in times past, nor do I now fly from thee. There is nothing new or strange in what I do; I only follow my common mode of life in peaceful years. Now I will tell thee why I do not at once join battle with thee. We Scythians have neither towns nor cultivated lands, which might induce us, through fear of their being taken or ravaged, to be in a hurry to fight with you.

Ancient sources also mention how Idanthyrsus sent out some odd gifts to Darius, and they entailed – a mouse, a frog, a bird and five arrows. And while the Persian emperor tried to convince himself of the good omens symbolized by these objects, one of his courtiers possibly interpreted the gifts in a more undiplomatic (thought correct) manner. He said –

If you Persians do not fly away like the birds, or hide in the earth like mice, or leap into a lake like frogs, then you will never see your homes again, but will die under our arrows.

Consequently, the Scythians became more aggressive in their approach, and started to make violent raids and forays into the confused Persian foraging parties. They even tried to cut off the potential Persian retreat points (albeit unsuccessfully) at the Danubian bridges. One particular episode also suggests that the nomads almost offered the Persians a pitched battle, though it was possibly a ruse that was set up to psychologically afflict the Persian ruler. In any case, given his experience in conducting military affairs, Darius was acutely aware that his situation was becoming precarious at the passing of each day. So, though humiliated, he finally decided to make his orderly retreat back to Danube, thus mirroring later day failed campaigns like Napoleon’s invasion of Russia and Operation Barbarossa during WWII. As a result, the Scythians did manage to score a strategic victory over a superpower, and continued to exert their influence in the proximate regions for almost three more centuries.


Sources: AncientEnclopediaNationalGeographic / SmithsonianMag /  / Livius / Lost-Civilizations

Book References: The World of the Scythians (By Renate Rolle) / The Scythians 700–300 BC (By E.V. Cernenko)

  • Mara Cohen

    Unfortunate error in calling any State on the Iron Age Levant “Palestine”. There was no such State at that time, nor is there now. The Roman Province of “Syria-Palestina” did not appear until post the Bar Kochba Rebellion against Roman Occupation, and per standard Roman usage, they enslaved much of the population and took them to Europe as slaves. The Roman Occupation ended in 638 C.E. with the Arab invasion and conquest.

    • Dattatreya Mandal

      The term “Peleset” (transliterated from hieroglyphs as P-r-s-t) is found in five inscriptions referring to a neighboring people or land starting from circa 1150 BC during the Twentieth dynasty of Egypt. Assyrian inscriptions also refer to the region of “Palashtu” or “Pilistu”, beginning with Adad-nirari III in the Nimrud Slab in circa 800 BC through to a treaty made by Esarhaddon more than a century later. These were probably the origins of the term Palestine, though clear cut use of the term ‘Palestine’ was possibly given by Herodotus by 5th century BC – which is still during the timeline of the Scythians. In any case, the HISTORICAL term Palestine is still used to refer to the region (irrespective of when it was coined), as opposed to some modern pseudo-state – much like the term Levant, which only which appeared in English in 1497 AD.

      So in other words, the argument becomes moot – since ‘Levant’ (derived from French) in itself is a far newer term than Palestine.

      • Mara Cohen

        Your anachronistic political identification of the States current at the time being in error, you simply destroy your own credibility, and objective analysis apparently being beyond you. The common language of North Semitic Peoples certainly did apply to Invaders, which is what the Hebrew, and other North Semitic Peoples referenced the Sea People as (P’lestim). However it was not a geographic area name until the Romans. Even the Greek use of the term “Phillistia” translated into the Latin “Palestina” was in reference to an invading Sea People at the time of the Bronze Age Collapse.

        • Dattatreya Mandal

          “Your anachronistic political identification of the States current at the time being in error” – the only politicizing here is done by you. I made it clear that Palestine as a term is used to denote the geographical region, not any political entity – as that was/is the region’s name designated since ancient times (with its name derived from origins that hark back to Iron Age). And oddly enough, you are contradicting yourself by calling the region – Iron Age Levant. Levant as a term is more than 1,800 years NEWER than Palestine – and yet it is a part of your argument. So your point about “it was not a geographic area name until the Romans” becomes wholly moot. In any case, since you are keen on politicizing history, it is your prerogative, and I do not want to take part in further conversation.

          Moreover, among the website’s over 1600 subscribers, there are a few actual historians and also a myriad well-informed readers. Since I have not destroyed my “credibility” in front of them (till now), I am not too worried about an ill-informed, random internet poster.

          • Mara Cohen

            Of course you don’t, certainly not in your arrogance. However, having had to deal with numerous errors of this nature in dealing with my own area of endeavor, I do recognize the misuse of nomenclature for what it is. By the way, since you wish to not use “Levant”, which does not confuse the geographical/political issue-why do you not simply use the names of the extant States at the time you specifically are writing about. Quite well documented, Empire and Tribal States both. Including the City States of the P’listim (Invaders).

          • Dattatreya Mandal

            After compiling a 3,000-word post by some exhaustive means, when a random guy/girl on the internet sends you an email saying ” idiotic mistake of nomenclature” and “such errors detract from any historical credibility the author may have”, I guess I have every right to be ‘arrogant’ – as you put it. Secondly, there was no issue of geographical/political confusion; I simply used the ancient term for the region – Palestine, and I stick by it without any political affiliation – since I detest mixing politics with history. The only so-called ‘issue’ is brought forth by you, and that too without any valid argument. Simply put, you are the one who is keen on ‘confusing’ a modern political entity with a historical term. Thirdly, as for using ‘City States of the P’listim’, very few readers could have identified the actual geographical region I was talking about, given its etymological complexity. And finally as for using Levant, the term is medieval in origin, and shouldn’t be used in an article relating to ancient people.

        ROH Subscription

To join over 2,100 other subscribers, simply provide your email address: