Impressive ruins of a Dark Age royal palace discovered near the birthplace of King Arthur


Archaeologists from the Cornwall Archaeological Unit (funded by English Heritage) have unearthed the structural remnants of what was probably quite an imposing Dark Age royal palace. The discovery was made at the Tintagel Castle site, a striking area by England’s Cornwall coast that is often linked to the legends of King Arthur. To that end, even the preliminary findings from just four trenches have entailed 3-ft thick stone walls, complemented by steps and slate flagstone floors. These ruins date back to early 6th century AD, and were possibly constructed by the kings of Dumnonia, the Brythonic rulers who held sway over the most western parts of South West England, roughly between the time period of late 4th and 7th centuries.

Now the question naturally arises – how does all of these relate to the legend of King Arthur? Well from the historical perspective, the legends of King Arthur were made famous by 12th-century writer Geoffrey of Monmouth, who mentioned all the popular tropes like Excalibur, Merlin and the Knights of the Round Table in his pseudo-historical account of Historia Regum Britanniae (‘The History of the Kings of Britain’). The chronicle, though often considered wildly inaccurate in terms of British history, puts forth the birthplace of King Arthur at Tintagel.


Geoffrey of Monmouth also mentioned how the site of Tintagel was a stronghold of a Cornish duke during the time of conception of Arthur. Interestingly enough, Tintagel was just an abandoned rocky outcrop in Geoffrey’s lifetime (circa 1136 AD). A medieval castle, known as the Tintagel Castle, was only built at the site after hundred years, some time in 13th century AD. So in other words, the 12th-century writer possibly had no physical evidence of a Dark Age stronghold at Tintagel, and yet the mention of an imposing structure is made in his accounts. And now in our modern context, archaeologists have finally confirmed the actual existence of such a palatial complex at the famed site. This is what Win Scutt, English Heritage’s properties curator for the West of England, had to say (to The Independent)-

The discovery of high-status buildings – potentially a royal palace complex – is helping to reveal an intriguing picture of what life was like in a place of such importance in the historically little-known centuries following the collapse of Roman administration in Britain.

Now beyond fantastical coincidences and folkloric traditions, there is actual historical evidence to consider. In that regard, in spite of sensational claims made in the legends the King Arthur, the palatial stronghold was possibly abandoned simply because its inhabitants wanted to escape the bubonic plague that was transmitted from the Mediterranean lands. And since we are talking about faraway lands, archaeologists were pleasantly surprised by a fragment of a large bowl found inside the complex – with its origins determined to be from Anatolia (present-day Turkey).

Suffice it to say, there is still much to unearth and assess at Tintagel, with archaeologists expected to conduct even bigger excavations at the site by next year. As for now, the connection between Arthur and the Dark Age royal palace is rather based on flimsy ‘conjectural’ grounds; though the project might shed more light on the often-overlooked Brythonic kingdoms that controlled parts of Britain between the late Roman and the Anglo-Saxon period – a vague epoch that fueled the semi-legendary statuses of characters like Arthur.


Source: TheIndependent / All Images Credit: Emily Whitfield-Wicks

2 Comments on "Impressive ruins of a Dark Age royal palace discovered near the birthplace of King Arthur"

  1. Brody Jackson | May 27, 2017 at 11:54 pm |

    Fascinating find! They certainly lived in a dramatic landscape. I live in Florida – flat and no drama, in the landscape anyway – at all.

  2. Excuse me for asking, but is “built at the site after hundred years, some time in 13th century AD.” a normal British sentence? Or is the lack of definite articles just an accidental oversight?

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.