Varangian Guard: 12 Things You Should Know

10_Varangian_Guard-facts_Byzantine

Introduction

Exotic, ferocious, and heavily armored – this, in a nutshell, defined the eminent presence of the Varangian Guard (Greek: Τάγμα των Βαράγγων, Tágma tōn Varángōn) in the ostentatious court of the Eastern Roman Empire (Byzantine Empire). Probably one of the most famous military units in the realm of history, the Varangian Guard at its height was responsible for the protection of the ‘Roman’ emperor; thus alluding to an incredible scope where the powerful Byzantine Emperors were personally guarded by a regiment of foreign fighters.

However beyond their ‘guarding’ duties, the Varangians occasionally took the field – and in this fashion, they carved out a fierce reputation for themselves in both European and Asian theaters of war. So without further ado, let us take a gander at ten incredible facts you should know about the Varangian Guard.

Who were the Varangians?

10_Varangian_Guard-facts_Byzantine_1

The Eastern Roman Empire (or Byzantine Empire) was still the richest political entity in Europe in the middle ages, and as such its capital of Constantinople tended to attract invaders (in search of plunder) and mercenaries (in search of pay) alike. In the same vein, the warriors and adventurers of Rus were also enthralled by its riches.

Now Rus in itself comprised a loose federation of Slavic trading towns and villages spread across what is now modern-day Russia and Ukraine. These settlements, like Kyiv, were controlled by an originally Swedish elite (who arrived from Scandinavia during the Viking Age). Over time, these Norsemen mixed with the local populace (mostly Slavs), thus giving rise to the ruling class of the Kievan Rus – composed of princes, nobles, and their armed retainers.

In any case, bands of these roving yet ambitious fighters of Scandinavian lineage gradually started to gravitate towards Constantinople (the Rus called it Miklagard – ‘The Great City’ or ‘City of Michael’) – some for audacious raiding purposes and others for lucrative trading. And by the late 9th century AD, the Byzantine writers referred to them as the Varangians (or Varangian Rus).

These Varangians, when raiding in smaller groups, were usually defeated by the superior Byzantine forces. However, interestingly, many contemporary Byzantine chroniclers surmised with a mix of disgust, fear, and appreciation – how the “Scandinavians were frightening both in appearance and in equipment, they attacked with reckless rage and neither cared about losing blood nor their wounds”.

Cognizant of their potential, the Byzantine military and navy even employed some of these fiery Varangian mercenaries, as is evident from the presence of Scandinavian contingents in both the Italian expedition in 936 AD and the Syrian expedition in 955 AD.

Lastly, it should be noted that the very term Varangian (Old Norse: Væringjar; Greek: Βάραγγοι, or Varangoi) is open for etymological debate. However, most scholars tend to agree that it is derived from Old Norse væringi, which is a compound of vár ‘pledge or vow of fidelity and gengi ‘companion or fellowship’. Simply put, the term Varangian can be roughly translated to ‘sworn companion’ – which proved to be an apt categorization, as later history was witness to their numerous feats.

Forged by the Civil War of the ‘Greeks’

10_Varangian_Guard-facts_Byzantine_2
Basil II flanked by his royal guards. Illustration by Giuseppe Rava

As with innumerable episodes of history, it was internal turmoil that brought about a significant change in the affairs of an empire. This time around, it was brought on by a civil war in the Byzantine Empire that pitted Emperor Basil II Porphyrogenitus against the rebel Vardhas Phokas. The latter had audaciously marched on to Constantinople with his army by 987 AD.

Desperate for reinforcements, the Byzantine emperor sought military assistance from Vladimir the Great, the Grand Prince of Kievan Rus. Vladimir saw his opportunity in this deal and promptly send away around 6,000 men to the Roman emperor’s aid.

According to old sources (like the Russian Primary Chronicle, compiled in 1113 AD), these men were supposedly unruly and unpaid – and hence the Prince was rather happy to ‘ship’ the ‘axe bearing barbarians’ away to the ‘Greeks’ of the distant realm.

However, on entering the service of Basil II (by 988 AD), the group proved its mettle in various military encounters, thus ultimately allowing the emperor to crush the rebel army and its commanders. One chronicler grimly noted how this ferocious band of warriors ‘cheerfully hacked’ the enemies to pieces on the orders of the Byzantine Emperor.

On the political side of affairs, there was another significant development – the Rus prince Vladimir the Great converted to Orthodox Christianity (the state religion of the Byzantine Empire) and even married Princess Anna of Byzantine. This paved the way for a further ‘supply’ of warriors from Rus.

So by the end of the 10th century (and the beginning of the 11th century), Emperor Basil II wholeheartedly made use of his Varangians, and successfully campaigned far and wide, ranging from the Levant to Georgia. These far-flung campaigns tempered the ‘foreign’ Rus warriors into a disciplined body of troops who formed the core of the Imperial Guard of the Byzantine Empire. And so the famed Varangian Guard was forged – symbolizing the might of the Imperial throne.

Contrasting Status of Both Mercenaries and Royal Guards

10_Varangian_Guard-facts_Byzantine_3
Illustration by Giuseppe Rava

Employing mercenaries was a trademark of Byzantine military history even in the earlier centuries. But the recruitment of the Varangians (by Basil II) was certainly different in scope, simply because of the loyalty factor. To that end, the native Byzantine guards were genuinely mistrusted by the Emperor.

In essence, as historian Dr. Raffaele D’Amato mentioned (in his book The Varangian Guard: 988-1453)the Varangians were specifically employed to be directly loyal to their paymaster – the Emperor. In that regard, unlike most other mercenaries, they were dedicated, incredibly well trained, furnished with the best of armors, and most importantly devoted to their lord.

This sense of loyalty manifested many times in the course of history, with one particular incident involving the great Alexios Komnenos. After revolting, Komnenos appeared before the gates of Constantinople with his superior army, while the capital itself was defended only by some imperial soldiers, including the Varangian Guards and a few other mercenaries.

But in spite of their precarious situation, the Varangians stayed faithful to Emperor Nikephoros III Botaneiates till the last moment, before the ruler himself abdicated in favor of a bloodless coup. Suffice it to say, the guard was retained after Komnenos came to power.

On the other hand, it raises the question – then why was the Varangian Guard still branded as a mere mercenary group? Well, the answer relates to the practicality of court politics. Unlike other Imperial Guard regiments, the Varangian Guards were (mostly) not subject to political and courtly intrigues; nor were they influenced by the provincial elites and the common citizens.

Furthermore, given their direct command under the Emperor, the ‘mercenary’ Varangians actively took part in various encounters around the empire – thus making them an effective crack military unit, as opposed to just serving ceremonial offices of the royal guards.

The Anglo-Saxon Connection

10_Varangian_Guard-facts_Byzantine_4

As we mentioned before, the Varangian Guard was initially formed mostly of warriors and adventurers from Rus who tended to have Swedish lineage. However, by the late 11th century, these ‘Scandinavians’ were gradually replaced by the Anglo-Saxons from Britain. There was a socio-political side to this scope since most of England was overrun by the Normans under William the Conqueror (post-1066 AD).

As a result, the native Anglo-Saxon military elites of these lands had to look for opportunities elsewhere – thus kick-starting mini waves of migration from Britain to the Black Sea coasts, and then ultimately to Eastern Roman Empire.

Interestingly enough, many Byzantine commanders welcomed these refugees from the British Isles, with some even concocting propaganda measures that proclaimed the arrival of the ‘English’ Anglo-Saxons as being equal to the fealty of the Romano-British soldiers of ancient times (when Britain was a Roman province).

In fact, contemporary sources talk about how English was actually spoken in the streets of Constantinople, thus alluding to the presence of many Anglo-Saxon mercenaries. And almost like poetic justice, just fifteen years after the Battle of Hastings (where the Anglo-Saxons were decisively defeated by the Normans in 1066 AD), a group of English veterans got the chance for payback – at the Battle of Dyrrachion (1081 AD).

This time around they formed the core body of the Varangian Guard (under Alexios Komnenos) while being pitted against the Normans from southern Italy (under Robert Guiscard). Unfortunately for the Anglo-Saxon contingent, they were too eager to challenge their enemy – and so by breaking their formation, the Varangians charged into the right-wing of the Normans.

Their initial impact was devastating to Guiscard’s army. But once the tide stemmed, most of the Varangian Guards were surrounded and woefully outnumbered. Afflicted by weariness and heavy armor, the group was mostly destroyed in a piecemeal manner by Norman counter-charging.

Ethnicity and the Numbers of Varangian Guards

10_Varangian_Guard-facts_Byzantine_5
Illustration by Giuseppe Rava

We have already talked about how the early members of the Varangian Guard mostly hailed from Rus, while by the late Eleventh Century they were gradually superseded by the ‘English’. But that doesn’t necessarily mean that the guard was exclusively composed of these two groups.

In fact, from the initial times, the Swedish Varangians were often accompanied by their Norwegian brethren who arrived directly from Scandinavia (as opposed to Russia). Similarly, by the 11th century, the Danes also arrived on Byzantine shores, along with the Anglo-Saxons.

Moreover, according to contemporary sources (like that of Leo of Ostia) – as referenced by Dr. D’Amato, there are mentions of the ‘Gualani’ people serving in the Varangian Guard. Historians are not sure about their origins, with hypotheses identifying ‘Gualani’ as Welsh people and in some cases as the Vlachs (of Eastern Europe).

Beyond the melting pot of different nationalities, there is always the question of the actual numbers that were present in the Varangian Guard. During Basil II’s time, the figure was kept at more or less 6,000 men. But the numbers, in accordance with sources, kept fluctuating after the 11th century – though most of them dealt with the Varangians participating in battles, and these warriors were possibly only a part of the entire Varangian Guard in its full capacity.

In any case, the figures range from 4,500 men to a paltry 540 men. By the late 13th century AD, the numbers were (probably) officially dropped to 3,000 men. By then the Varangian Guard formed one-half of the Taxis (the core army of the Empire of Nicaea), while the other half was formed by the Vardariotai, who were Magyar (Hungarian) in origin.

Mixed Tactics and the Pelekys Axe

10_Varangian_Guard-facts_Byzantine_6

There are many literary sources that talk about the prowess of the Varangian Guard on the battlefields. However, there is surprisingly little knowledge about how they actually functioned in the battles in regard to tactics. Now given their penchant for wielding axes and wearing heavy armor, it can be credibly surmised that the Varangian Guard operated as an infantry formation in defensive positions by the Emperor’s side.

However, there were instances when the Varangians were arrayed at the front of the army while being backed by the Vardariotai, who operated as experienced horse archers during Alexios Komnenos’ time. In essence, this contrasting composition provided the effective tactical scope of shock and missile units.

But there were also scenarios when the Varangian Guard was deployed at the back to protect the precious baggage train, while they supported other heavy infantry formations of the Eastern Roman army. Simply put, such changing positions on the field possibly mirrored the adaptable ‘mixed’ tactics preferred by the Varangians – thus confirming their elite military status. To that end, it was almost customary to allow the Varangians to take the first plunders from a conquered settlement.

In any case, the popular imagery of a Varangian guardsman generally reverts to a tall, heavily armored man bearing a huge axe resting on his shoulder. This imposing axe in question entailed the so-called Pelekys, a deadly two-handed weapon with a long shaft that was akin to the famed Danish axe. Consequently, the Varangians were often referred to as the pelekyphoroi in medieval Greek.

Now interestingly, while the earlier Pelekys tended to have crescent-shaped heads, the shape varied in later designs, thus alluding to the more ‘personalized’ styles preferred by the guard members. As for its size, the sturdy battle-axe often reached an impressive length of 140 cm (55-inch) – with a heavy head of 18 cm (7-inch) length and a blade width of 17 cm (6.7-inch).

Countering Piracy and Policing Streets

10_Varangian_Guard-facts_Byzantine_7

With their Viking heritage and Rus tradition of distant seafaring, it was expected of the Varangians to have maritime skills. So beyond battlefield maneuvers and palace duties, some of the younger (or less experienced) members of the Varangian Guard were chosen to actually hunt down pirates. These guardsmen were deployed in specially-made light marine crafts called the ousiai, and they worked in unison with the other Norse and Russian mercenaries.

But other than glorious feats in battles and adventurous sea-raids, the Varangian Guard was also involved in slightly more mundane duties, like policing the streets of Constantinople. They rather carved up a brutal reputation for themselves – who were known to enforce strict laws and arrest the political opponents of the emperor.

And as an extension of their perceived ferocity and penchant for violence, few Varangians were also employed as jailers because of their ‘specialization’ in torturing techniques. Interestingly, Georgius Pachymeres, a 13th-century Greek historian, and philosopher talked about one such chief (epistates) of the prison guards, whose moniker was Erres ek Englinon or ‘Harry from England’.

The Wineskins of the Byzantine Emperor

10_Varangian_Guard-facts_Byzantine_8
Illustration by Angus McBride

Now while we mentioned before how the Varangians were employed as rigorous law enforcers in the capital, they themselves were not too reluctant to break certain laws of decorum. As Dr. D’Amato mentioned, one of the reasons for their boisterous nature was possibly due to their notable love for Greek wine.

Often derogatorily called the “Emperor’s wineskins”, their absurd levels of drunkenness often landed the guards into trouble – with two particular incidents even involving drunken guardsmen assaulting their own emperor. And beyond the obsession for alcohol (that sometimes turned into abuse), the Varangians were also known for their fascination for visiting brothels, along with the fancy for other ‘Greek’ stuff, like Hippodrome races and spectacles.

High Fee for Entry Into the Guard

10_Varangian_Guard-facts_Byzantine_9
Illustration by Giuseppe Rava

Given their status as the elite members of the Imperial Guard, the Varangians were obviously paid very highly. However, in what may seem like an odd arrangement, only affluent members were inducted into the guard. The threshold was maintained by a relatively high fee (in gold) that the would-be inductee had to pay the Roman authorities in order to be considered for the role of a Varangian guardsman.

And after passing this monetary ‘test’, the applicant was further examined and evaluated, so as to maintain the quality and discipline of the Varangian Guard. In any case, it should be noted that in most situations, the Varangians after being accepted, acquired far more riches (from compensations, bonuses, and spoils) than their initial fee of entry.

For example, after the death of a Byzantine Emperor, the Varangian Guard was supposedly given the incredible right to take as much gold from the Imperial treasury as they could carry in both hands. This peculiar right, possibly derived from an Old Norse ritual, was aptly and rather unpretentiously called polutasvarf or’palace pillaging’.

So from a realistic perspective, there was no dearth of applicants – with even the rejected ones making names for themselves in the other (albeit less renowned) mercenary companies of the Byzantine Empire. In fact, the emigration of well-to-do warriors from Sweden to ‘Greece’ was actively discouraged by the medieval Swedish law of Västgötalagen (or Westrogothic Law), with one statute mentioning how these Varangian Guard members couldn’t inherit while staying in Byzantine service.

Harald Hardrada of the Varangian Guard

10_Varangian_Guard-facts_Byzantine_10

In our previous entry, we talked about how the applicant needed to provide a lump-sum amount of gold to be considered for the Varangian Guard. This seemingly unique measure allowed many rich adventurers, princes, and even warlords from northern Europe to take their (and their retinue’s) chance to be inducted into this elite mercenary group. One such adventurer was Harald Hardrada – one of the fiercest Viking warriors of his time (circa 11th century).

In his teenage years, Harald had to escape from his native Norway after ending up in a losing battle for the throne. The young man made his way to Kievan Rus, and made a name for himself in various military encounters, by fighting for the Grand Prince Yaroslav the Wise. But after rising to the rank of a military captain, young Harald took a gamble and made his way to Constantinople, along with 500 of his personal followers. Fortunately for the group, most of them were selected for the Varangian Guard, and thus started Harald’s incredible journey to redemption.

The ‘Viking’ once again proved his worth and fought in various successful assignments in Sicily against both the Muslims and the Normans. According to his skald Þjóðólfr Arnórsson, many conflicts took the still young Harald to Anatolia and Iraq, where he had successfully fought off Arab pirates.

After reportedly capturing around eighty Arab strongholds, the Scandinavian even made his way to Jerusalem, to probably oversee a peace agreement made between the Eastern Roman Empire and the Fatimid Caliphate in 1036 AD. However, it was in 1041 AD when the Viking arguably played his most crucial role as a Varangian – by ruthlessly putting down a Bulgarian uprising led by Peter Delyan. This supposedly gained Harald the nickname of “Devastator of the Bulgarians” (Bolgara brennir).

In the latter years, he acquired much wealth and prestige throughout the Roman realm. In fact, Varangian Guard Harald earned the high rank of Manglabites (a specific corps of bodyguards).But in spite of his status as an elite guardsman, he planned to leave Constantinople for Rus, probably because of an ill-favored political climate in the capital.

In Rus, Harald married a Russian princess, elevated his status to a Prince, and then triumphantly made a return to his homeland Norway. And then, in the years between 1046 – 1065 AD, Harald was finally able to gain the kingship of Norway through various political and military machinations (maneuvers that were undoubtedly learned during his time in the Eastern Roman court).

And ultimately in 1066 AD, the King of Norway – Harald Hardrada, launched the last ‘Viking’ invasion of England; thereby crippling the local Anglo-Saxon resistance, and thus paving the way for the Norman conquest of Britain. And oddly enough, pushing forth the historical cycle, many of the dispossessed Anglo-Saxons of England, in turn, went on to become members of the Varangian Guard in the latter years.

Now while this unique episode serves as a rather extreme example, it does provide some insights into the lives of the Varangian Guardsmen – where the wondrous scope of adventures and actions overshadowed any semblance of normalcy expected from a well-paid, ‘governmental’ military career.

The Decline of the Varangian Guard

It should be noted that while the Varangians proved their mettle in many battles, they also faced their fair share of defeats. As mentioned earlier, at the Battle of Dyrrachion (1081 AD), the Guard was almost annihilated by a well-timed cavalry charge of the Normans.

But even more humiliating was the episode of the Fourth Crusade (1204 AD) when the Varangians supposedly fled from the approaching Crusaders. This uncharacteristic turn of events may have transpired because many of the guardsmen were left unpaid.

In any case, there was a historical shift in the functions of the Varangian Guard, especially after the early 13th century. Simply put, during the 11th century, the Varangians, under Byzantine authority, actively took part in battles. However, post the Fourth Crusade, they were mostly relegated to palace and prison duties.

According to some historians, this might have to do more with the rising practical importance of cavalry and mobile divisions on battlefields, as opposed to the innate effectiveness of the Varangians. To that end, one of the last mentions of the axe-bearing Varangian guard comes from chronicler Adam of Usk in 1404 AD.

Honorable Mention – The Varangian Bra and Runestones

10_Varangian_Guard-facts_Byzantine_11

The trademark of the Varangian Guard pertained to carrying an imposing ax and wearing heavy armor (though in rare cases, they were also lightly armed). Relating to the latter, the armor often entailed ringmail shirts that were sometimes reinforced with lamellar (klivanion) or scale armor.

The unwieldy hauberk (mail shirt) weighed around a significant 30 lbs, and so the guardsmen adopted a type of chest harness known as the Varangian Bra. Usually made of leather, the harness consisted of a breast strap with two shoulder straps going over each shoulder, which connected the front and rear end of the strap.

Possibly inspired by their ‘eternal’ foes – the Sassanid Persians, the Eastern Romans adopted this peculiar armor (along with buckled belts) as a solution for holding the bulky mail shirt together, which in turn allowed for better mobility on the battlefield.

Beyond bulky armor, the legacy of these Norsemen (and Northern Europeans) can also be surmised via the various Varangian runestones that were erected across Scandinavia to honor and commemorate the Guardsmen. Some of these specimens, known as the Greece runestones, directly refer to the expeditions made by the Varangians to the ‘East’. Conversely, many runes were also etched on Byzantine landmarks, including the famed Hagia Sophia and the Piraeus Lion – thus alluding to the Scandinavian presence in Constantinople.

Book References: The Varangian Guard: 988-1453 (By Raffaele D’Amato) / The Varangians of Byzantium (By Sigfús Blöndal and Benedict Benedikz)

Online Sources: De Re Militari / AngelFire / HistoryBits / WeaponsandWarfare

Featured Image Credit: kosv01

5 Comments on "Varangian Guard: 12 Things You Should Know"

  1. Rannheid Sharma | December 29, 2017 at 8:43 am |

    Interestingly, the so-called “Vestfoldteppe” fro SE Norway is thought to have been brought back from Byzantium by the V guard. You can see that the pattern is quite distinct from the traditional Norwegian patterns used in e.g. woven wall hangings. Scroll arrows bottom right for examples: https://www.op.no/bolig/bildeserie-vestfoldtepper/g/1-85-7333711

  2. Dattatreya Mandal | November 8, 2017 at 4:23 am |

    By ‘decisively defeated’, we meant that the defeat was decisive when it came to the later political side of affairs – Norman takeover of England (as you mentioned yourself – “nearly 1000 years of British history would have been massively different”, if not for Hastings). In any case, thank you for the comment. We have also covered the Battle of Hastings in detail here – https://www.realmofhistory.com/2017/02/20/12-facts-battle-of-hastings/

  3. simon boyland | November 7, 2017 at 10:08 pm |

    Excellent article. There is only One thing that I disagree with, and that is the notion that the Anglo-Saxons were “decisively defeated” at the Battle Of Hastings. The Anglo-Saxons lost for sure, but because of the indiscipline of the housecarls, up until this point the battle had been very much in the Anglo-Saxons favour, and the likelihood is that but for the housecarls leaving the shield wall then the Anglo-Saxons would have taken the day, and nearly 1000 years of British history would have been massively different.

  4. Женат на украиночке | July 30, 2016 at 4:50 am |

    Лохлушка, ну отчего ты така тупа? Езжай в нэньку, спасай её ))

  5. Ukrainian girl | July 21, 2016 at 10:30 pm |

    How do they manage to tie Russia-Mouskowy to all this is still a riddle.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.