The Polish Winged Hussars epitomized the shock cavalry arm of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth between the 16th and 18th centuries. Showcasing their stylized yet heavily armored ensembles, partly fueled by the late-16th-century reforms of Stephen Bathory (one of the most successful kings in Polish history), the winged hussars serving under their dedicated banners (chorągiew) were essentially the elite of the (often victorious) armies of the thriving Eastern European commonwealth.
Known for their decisive impact on numerous military encounters, like the Battle of Lubieszów (1577 AD), Battle of Pitschen (1588 AD), Battle of Kircholm (1605 AD), Battle of Klushino (1610 AD), and the Battle of Vienna (1683 AD) – which possibly entailed the largest cavalry charge in the history of warfare, the Polish Winged Hussars are rightly held in high regard by military historians and aficionados. However, at the same time, many of their achievements and visual aspects have taken the route of romanticism (and embellishment), especially fueled by the non-contemporary chroniclers of the 19th century. So without further ado, beyond misconceptions and exaggerations, let us take a gander at 15 things you should know about one of the most successful and spectacular cavalry troops of all time – the Polish Winged Hussars.
1) The Roman origin?
While popular notions tend to pinpoint the origins of hussars in Hungary, the history of hussars probably harks back to the Eastern Roman (Byzantine) times, circa 10th century, when the Empire recruited light cavalry from the Balkans (especially the Serbs), known as the chonsarioi (possibly derived from cursores, the Roman light cavalry). Many of the cavalrymen, known as gusars in Serbian, continued to operate in the region, even after the demise of the Eastern Roman Empire.
And while the majority of such gusars was perceived as unruly, brigand-like groups, they nevertheless did serve and protect Rascia, the medieval Serbian state that was ultimately conquered by the ascendant Ottoman Empire. Consequently, most of these unorganized yet militarily-effective regiments migrated to Hungary (to serve as the huszár) and Poland.
2) The early hussars of Poland –
The Polish administration of the early 16th-century started to ‘regroup’ and furnish actual cavalry companies from the remnants of the Serbian gusars. Additionally, they also employed other nationalities like the fellow Poles, Lithuanians, and Hungarians to bolster the hussar numbers (who were known as usar). And while the original Serbian gusars preferred their light armor and asymmetrical Balkan shields (similar to the Albanian stradiots), the Polish usars adopted the heavy Hungarian style of armor and armaments, comprising mail-shirts, helmets, shields, and lances.
By circa 1576 AD, the Polish hussars underwent a reform that standardized their equipment and armor, in line with Polish king Stephan Batory’s personal regiments of hussars. This translated to the adoption of breastplate armor and longer lances along with the eschewing of shields. In other words, these companies of cavalrymen, who bridged the gap between heavy lancers and mobile horsemen, formed the first of the famed Polish Winged Hussars that we tend to admire and glorify in the realm of military history.
3) The system of company and companions –
A company of troops was known as rota in the 16th century Poland, and each rota of Polish hussars generally consisted anywhere between 100 to 150 horsemen (the figures did touch 300 on rare occasions for the hetmans and incredibly wealthy nobles). These rotas were furnished and commanded by the rotmistrz (‘rota-master’), who usually hailed from the upper sections of nobility (or szlachta) of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Simply put, the wealthy rotmistrz was tasked with forming up his company of hussars on a contract basis that was stamped by the offices of the monarchy as a ‘letter of recruitment’. This essentially made the rota his extended bodyguard unit that could produce revenues via payments from the state along with war booty.
This naturally raises the question – how did these companies recruit the hussars? Well, most of these rotas comprised many smaller retinues (poczet) headed by the towarzysze (companion). Simply put, each company of hussars was composed of multiple retinues (which had two to six retainers or pacholiks), and these smaller groups were assembled by their individual towarzysze. These ‘companions’ also came from the szlachta class of Polish nobility, albeit with lesser means than the rotmistrz – and they were tasked with providing manpower (with their retainers), sharing the economic burden of the company, and even performing duties of an officer at the camp and on the battlefield.
4) The social aspect –
It should be noted that the Polish Winged Hussars were indeed considered an elite group of mounted soldiers during their contemporary age. Essentially, these mounted companies were touted as exalted institutions that merged martial prowess with stately panache and dedicated patriotism. And thus, even while bearing the rank of a junior officer in such an exclusive group, the towarzysze (companion) rightly considered himself as a member of an elite military fraternity that tended to overshadow other army divisions of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth.
On the practical level, a service (generally ranging from three to five years) in the company of Polish Winged Hussars translated to social advancements and opportunities for the towarzysze. To that end, a lower-ranking noble (with lesser economic means) could gain titles (like ‘soldier-knights’), endowments, and future civil careers from the monarchy. In fact, there were also known cases of rich men from even non-noble backgrounds who purchased their way into the ranks of towarzysze, though such scenarios were pretty rare. On the other hand, the younger sons of the wealthier nobles also preferred the status of towarzysze, since they were less likely to inherit their familial properties.
5) The retainers – backbone of the Polish Hussars
However, beyond the scope of high-born nobles, wealthy magnates, and well-to-do officers, the core of the Polish Hussar companies was composed of regular horsemen or retainers (or pacholiks – ‘youths’). Majority of these troops came from the non-noble background, thus establishing the trend of lower classes opting for military careers in the army. A few of these retainers also hailed from the aforementioned szlachta class, though of the impoverished nature. In other words, the military relationship between a towarzysze (companion) and his pacholiks (retainers) was somewhat akin to a knight and his squires if perceived through the lens of Western European analogy.
However, if we insert an economic angle in the company of Polish Winged Hussars, the towarzysze certainly had more control over his retainers, since he directly owned the equipment and horses of his followers. To that end, the pacholiks were often treated as nominal servants and even as slaves with irregular pays and unfair shares of war booty. By late 17th century, decades after the heydays of the Polish Hussars, the pacholiks were simply called pocztowy (meaning ‘of the poczet‘ or retinue), thus etymologically snatching away the romanticism associated with the term ‘youths’.
6) The ‘inflated’ mode of mustering –
Like most contemporary military units of the time, the mounted horsemen of the hussar companies, after their drafting, were officially presented before a commissioner who was tasked with registering their muster rolls. However, while on the official level, each company had 200 horsemen, these figures were rather inflated by theoretically considering the strength of the retinue of the rotmistrz himself (that often went beyond 20 retainers on paper, but was non-existent in reality), along with some of the followers of higher-ranking towarzysze. Simply put, the actual strength of individual companies of hussars often stood at 164 to 180 mounted soldiers, as opposed to the standard 200 horsemen.
Now while this may seem to be an odd oversight on the part of the officials, the practice of ‘inflated’ manpower was adopted to suit and adjust the extra costs that were borne by the rotmistrz for running his company of hussars. In essence, the state-administered pay for the 20 to 30 extra horsemen (as laid down in the letter of recruitment) was directly taken by the commander to cover the expenses of his unit and officers, while also accounting for some profit out of his military venture. In that regard, by the mid-17th century, the companies of Polish Winged Hussars rather mirrored commercial enterprises in which the rotmistrz (usually a wealthy magnate), though officially being the commander, only held an honorary post – which allowed him to ply his business far away from the frontlines. The hussars in actual battles were commanded by his subordinates and career soldiers, including a lieutenant of the towarzysze rank.
7) The different avenues of ‘payments’ –
The Polish Winged Hussars of late 16th century received a salary of 15 zloty, with payments being made on a quarterly basis (thus amounting to 60 zloty per year). This sum rose to 51 zloty by the mid-17th century, but remained constant till the early decades of the 18th-century, in spite of inflations and currency crashes throughout the mercurial years. The officers (of the towarzysze rank) and the commander (rotmistrz) of the companies were also paid additional state-sanctioned funds, including kuchenne (or ‘kitchen money’) that amounted to a substantial 150 zloty per quarter for 100 horsemen and the hiberna (or ‘winter allowance’) for sheltering and lodging during winters. The latter money was sometimes taken forcibly from the host population and often contributed substantially to the revenues of a hussar company. Additionally, the state was also expected to pay for the hussars’ numerous apparels, including the famed leopard skins and wings.
And of course, other than such official (and unofficial) payment methods, many of the Polish Winged Hussars relied on the war booty. Furthermore, as we mentioned before, the officers of the towarzysze rank also looked forth to high-paying state offices after their serving period in the army. Some of them even held other military ranks (like colonelcy) that had salaried benefits in addition to their roles in the companies of hussars.
8) The armor –
We already talked about how Polish king Stephan Batory played an instrumental role in standardizing the armor and equipment of the hussars. Pertaining to the former, the predominant armor adopted by the Polish Winged Hussars from late 16th century to early 17th century (arguably their Golden Age) followed the style of the heavy Hungarian cavalry, which translated to the anima cuirass with its lobster-like arrangement of plates. Later it was modified into a ‘half-lobster’ form after 1600 AD. However, by the 1630s, the armor of the hussars once again took a heavier route that was coupled with their ostentatious styles and oriental fashions (influenced by their Turkish foes). And interestingly enough, the hussar armor was also made more visually impressive by burnishing the layers, as opposed to the Western style of blackening the outer facades to prevent rust.
Batory’s Hussars were additionally known to wear mail-sleeves and gauntlets, but both of these protective elements were relegated in the favor of comprehensive arm-guards by the last years of 16th century. Moreover, it should be noted that it was only the towarzysze ranked ‘companions’ and their chosen retainers who often flaunted their heavier, well-crafted armor with better finishes. On the other hand, the pacholiks who served in the rear-ranks of a hussar company were only given cheaper versions of the classier sets. By the later years of the 17th century, even such protective measures were taken away, with the ordinary retainer (pocztowy) only donning his standard low-cost helmet and eastern long coat without any metal cuirass.
9) The weapons –
The definitive weapon associated with the Polish Winged Hussars arguably relates to the lance, more specifically the kopia lance. Usually made of cheap pine or fir wood, the kopia was crafted for single-use purposes, and as such was designed with a hollowed shaft that the made weapon particularly light in its bearing. According to contemporary sources, most kopia lances measured somewhere between 13 to 19 ft, and they were possibly crafted by combining longitudinal, hollowed-out segments of the wood that were consolidated with sinews, glue, and silk threads – thus resulting in a composite yet light-weight shaft. The kopia lances also had the distinguishing feature of the spherical handguards that were known as galka (‘knob’) in Polish (though foreigners described them as ‘apple-shaped’).
As for their secondary weapons, the Polish Winged Hussars preferred the saber (szabla), with the koncerz style sword being uniquely associated with these mounted companies. Designed as a stabbing weapon, the koncerz tended to have a thin square or triangular cross-section with a sharp pointed end (more akin to a spear point), which made it effective in piercing armor but inadequate for slashing. The hussars were also known to wield other varieties of swords, including the pallash (broadsword with saber-type hilt) and the karabela (distinguished by its bird’s head-shaped pommel).
Quite intriguingly, the early Polish hussars (circa 16th century) were also known to carry bows to the battlefield, with the anachronistic bow possibly perceived as a mark of honor (as opposed to a handy weapon) for the towarzysze officers. However, by the latter half of the century, many of the companies grudgingly took up firearms – as dictated by the practicality of the ever-evolving battlefield tactics. By 1576 AD, Stephan Batory further standardized the adoption of wheellock pistols for most cavalrymen of the Polish Winged Hussars. This tradition was rather expanded upon in the 17th century when some of the hussars even carried two pistols equipped with the efficient French flintlocks.
10) The famed wings and other apparels –
Probably the most controversial aspect of the Polish Winged Hussars relates to their wings. In essence, while the feathered elements defined the ‘winged’ visual flair of the hussars, historians and academics are still not sure as to how and why these wings were worn. Contemporary writers also gave confusing accounts of the wings, with one dating from circa 1674 AD mentioning how the hussars (still not standardized in their equipment) decorated themselves and their horses with gold-striped eagle feathers. After Batory’s reforms – wherein the king explicitly mentioned wings being a part of hussar uniform, the horsemen possibly inserted the simply-framed feathered wings (in pairs) at the back of their saddles.
This style of incorporating a pair of feathered wings into the saddle possibly continued till mid-17th century. But then again, it naturally raises the question – what about the popular imagery of Polish Winged Hussars charging into battles with the feathered adornments worn on their own backs (instead of the saddles)? Well, this may have been the case in the later part of the 17th century, especially during the reign of John Sobieski. For example, 18th-century Polish historian Jędrzej Kitowicz talked about how the Polish hussars wore their multi-colored feathers attached to the armor via wooden segments. On the other hand, Kitowicz also mentioned how their Lithuanian counterparts still preferred the ‘old’ style of saddle-connected wings.
In any case, beyond the scope of ‘how’, scholars still debate the actual functionality of these wings. To that end, it is a possible misconception that the wings were worn due to the ominous sound-effects emanated during the course of a hussar charge. In fact, the very notion of the hussar wings producing shrill sounds during battles can be ascribed to foreign authors who did their part of romanticizing. This brings us to the another (and arguably more credible) possibility that the wings were mostly worn by the hussars during parades and special occasions. It should also be noted that the style of horsemen with decorative wings was not indigenous to the Polish Winged Hussars. They were preceded by the deli (meaning ‘reckless’ or ‘crazy’) horsemen recruited from the Balkans by the Ottomans.
In essence, many of historians are of the opinion that these wings, as opposed to auditory purposes, were used for their fashionable (and perhaps intimidating) flair that mirrored the high status enjoyed by the companies of the Polish Winged Hussars. So when the feathered wings were accompanied by their leopardskin-draped attires, burnished armor, and lances with fluttering pennants, the overall visual impact must have been a sight to behold. But of course, pertaining to the leopardskins, many of these seemingly ostentatious capes were sourced from smaller feline species like lynxes, with the pelts being sewn together. However, on rare occasions, many a rich towarzysze flaunted his cape made from the actual pelts of snow leopards.
11) The charge of the Polish Winged Hussars –
As opposed to the ‘tight-packed’ charge of the medieval European knights (who kept conrois formations), the Polish Winged Hussars kept relatively looser formations that allowed them to be more mobile and reactive on the battlefield, with dynamic maneuvers that often dictated sudden changes in directions and overlapping movements. When translated to a figure, each hussar possibly had a space of 6 ft length for tactical maneuvering.
Now beyond agile movements, the Polish Winged Hussars were known for their headlong charges, a seemingly anachronistic mode of engaging the enemy in the 16th-17th centuries, but nevertheless pretty effective when it came to deciding battle results. To that end, in a typical charging maneuver, it should be assumed that the hussars first tightened their formations (in contradiction to the myth of hussars being able to change their formations during charging). Interestingly enough, there is a possibility that unlike Western lancers, the Polish Winged Hussars kept their lances by their supports (known as tok) even during the point of impact.
In any case, since we brought up the scope of the impact of a cavalry charge, the subject is still a matter of debate. To that end, while there is no denying the sheer momentum a heavily armed cavalryman (like a hussar) can bring to the fore when charging into the masses of infantrymen, there are other factors of practicality to consider. One of these particular factors directly pertains to the ‘lighter’ kopia lances that were specifically designed to shatter at impact. Simply put, the kopia lance may not have been the deadly ‘impaling’ weapon against a heavy plate armored opponent, though such weapons were incredibly effective when the hussars faced the lighter infantrymen and cavalrymen fielded by the Ottomans and Russians.
In essence, much like their medieval knightly counterparts, the hussars charged not to completely demolish the opponent’s infantry but rather to psychologically afflict and dismantle (‘crack open’) the enemy formations. And when such a tactical task was accomplished, it was followed by the combined-arms method of the contemporary period that allowed the allied troops (ranging from other hussar companies, light cavalry like pancerny-kozak to haiduk infantrymen) to offer support and gain the initiative in the battlefield.
12) The other battlefield roles –
In practice, every company of Polish Winged Hussars was responsible for its own foraging, usually carried out by the servants and camp followers. However, on occasions, some pacholiks (sometimes even with few commanding officers of the towarzysze rank) were tasked with both scouting and aggressive foraging. Essentially these hussar detachments acted as organized raiding parties that traveled light and made forays into enemy frontier settlements and baggage trains.
And when it came to siege battles, the heavy hussars were expected to provide protection to the frontlines (by making sorties and absorbing enemy fire) while the allied infantrymen dug their defensive trenches. During rare situations, when the encounters turned into siege stalemates, the Polish Winged Hussars were known to courageously storm into the enemy positions. And on even rarer occasions, they dismounted and led assaults in pitched battles that resembled siege scenarios with field works, wooden obstacles, and wagon fortresses.
Unfortunately, while these actions may seem to allude to the ‘flexibility’ of the hussars as an all-scenario combat unit, in most siege battles they were relegated in favor of practical tactics (as opposed to bravado befitting their status). Simply put, the Polish Winged Hussars were too expensive (to train, outfit, and equip) to be expended in cramped and brutal melee fighting situations interspersed with devastating volleys of firearms. On the other hand, they truly shone in the decisive moments of the various pitched battles fought from 16th to 17th centuries.
13) The ‘daredevils’ –
Befitting their demeanor of courageousness against odds and daredevilry, Polish Winged Hussars also formed crack units from their different companies who were simply tasked with harassing the enemy before the real engagement. Known as the elears, these seemingly reckless horsemen (usually numbering 100, consisting of four hussars drawn from each company) advanced well ahead of the main army to engage the enemy with the means of various tactics, ranging from sacrificial charges, skirmishing to even throwing insults towards the foe.
Interestingly enough, while over time the impact of the daredevil elears diminished in the face of crippling firearms volleys, they did in many ways epitomize the esprit de corps of the Polish Winged Hussars. So even while in the later years of the 17th century, the role of the elears was taken over by lowly pacholiks and even ‘servants’, they always made use of the hussar lances and wings, possibly to intimidate and ruffle the enemy frontlines.
14) The predicament posed by firearms –
In their element, the Polish Winged Hussars were one of the most effective and finest military units of the period encompassing the years from late 16th century to early 17th century. And while some of their feats were embellished and exaggerated by contemporary writers, the hussars, without a doubt, fought and emerged victorious against a wide variety of enemies – a list that even included pikemen. Now pertaining to the latter, it should be noted that most of these pikemen engagements were won with help of other allied troops; and the exception was the Battle of Kircholm (circa 1605 AD), where the battle was decided in just 20 minutes by the devastating charge of the Lithuanian hussars.
However, as we fleetingly mentioned in the earlier entry, as opposed to pikemen (who could be dealt with combined tactics), the bane of the Polish Winged Hussars proved to be the firearms adopted by the enemies, especially the reformed Swedish armies instituted by Gustavus Adolphus and his successors. By the third decade of the 17th century, the once glorious charging maneuvers of the hussar companies were sometimes perceived as suicidal tactics, since even contemporary battlefields resembled sectors with mini-fortifications composed of wagons and wooden obstacles that were manned by determined infantrymen with firearms. And by the second half of the very century, concentrated and focused volleys from muskets coupled with intersecting firing arcs from improved artillery created brutal ‘killing fields’ that simply made most cavalry charges anachronistic in the ambit of military doctrines.
15) Honorable Mention – The Battle of Hodów
While there are mentions of various triumphs of the Polish Winged Hussars in encounters ranging from Kircholm to Vienna, popular history tends to miss the incredible episode of the Battle of Hodów – which can be dubbed as the Polish Thermopylae. Fought between over 10,000 Crimean Khanate irregulars and just 400 cavalry troops from the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth (comprising only 100 hussars), not much is known about the exact historical incidence. But it was possibly a large Tatar raid (or even invasion) into the Polish territory with the objective of capturing both loot and slaves. The local Polish administration responded to this surprise attack by calling upon mounted hussars and pancerni forces from two regional strongholds in Red Ruthenia (present-day western Ukraine). Their initial action involved boldly charging headlong into 700-strong Crimean light cavalry, which resulted in the successful dispersion of the enemy forces.
However, the Polish commander (presumably a man named Konstanty Zahorowski) did notice the sheer numerical superiority of the Tatars, and so decided to withdraw to the nearby Hodów village – to set up a defensive perimeter with heavy and sturdy wooden fences. Inside this fortified ring, the Poles (especially the Hussars) made use of their long-range firearms and staved off relentless waves of enemy assaults for over six hours. There are even accounts that suggest that the defending forces used improvised ammunition from ‘upcycled’ Tatar arrows. In any case, the heroic defense was successful, with over a thousand casualties on the Crimean Khanate side (who finally retreated to central Ukraine), and less than hundred on the Polish side. Later on, the ‘skirmish’ incident was used as state propaganda by renowned personalities like King John Sobieski.
Book References: Polish Winged Hussar 1576-1775 (By Richard Brzezinski)
Featured Image: Illustration by Mariusz Kozik
And in case we have not attributed or misattributed any image, artwork or photograph, we apologize in advance. Please let us know via the ‘Contact Us’ link, provided both above the top bar and at the bottom bar of the page.